Noah’s Ark Landing: Dispelling the Ararat Myth

In the discourse surrounding Noah’s ark landing, a widespread but unfounded assumption insists it rested atop Mount Ararat, a towering 17,000-foot volcanic peak in modern-day Turkey. However, a closer examination of the Book of Genesis challenges this notion, specifying “the mountains of Ararat,” suggesting a broader range rather than a singular summit.

Put yourself in Noah’s shoes – would you choose the precarious heights of Mount Ararat to land a colossal craft filled with animals, tools, and supplies? A more sensible location comes into focus, thanks to the research of the late David Allen Deal, proposing an 8,000-foot mountain 17 miles south of Mount Ararat.

Deal’s Persuasive Proposition

On the top left, Mount Ararat in present-day Turkey highlights the impracticality of attempting to land Noah’s ark on its summit.

Deal’s investigation suggests the ark initially settled at a welcoming 7,400 feet, providing raw materials for Mesha-Naxuan, the first post-Flood city. The ark’s descent, triggered by an earthquake, relocated the lumber yard a mile across the mountain, leaving two ark impressions.

Unveiling Etymological Clues

Noah’s Ark Landing
A depiction of the landing site on Mashu or Mesha Mountain, where survivors commenced the construction of Noah’s Ark Landing the first post-Flood city, Mesha.

Exploring linguistic roots, “Mesha,” meaning “drawn out of water,” aligns with Noah’s narrative. “Nax-xuan” interprets as “Noah’s Zion,” connecting the location with biblical heritage. Names like Masher Dag and Mashur Dag in Kurdish further affirm the region’s significance.

Literary Corroboration

Noah’s Ark Landing
At the anchorage site of Noah’s ship, there is a colossal geological twin-peaked feature.

The Epic of Gilgamesh references the “wall of heaven” on Mount Mesha, mirroring escarpment cliffs at the site. Mesha-Naxuan emerges as the first post-Flood city, constructed with ark materials, offering historical validation.

Unearthing the Site’s Secrets

Ancient artists revered Ham’s wife, Naamah, the Cainite princess mentioned in Genesis 4:22, associating her with the mountain where the ark landed.

David Deal’s discovery gains significance through the remnants of ancient habitations and the “wall of heaven.” The interconnected place-names on Mashur Dag provide clarity, solidifying the ark’s landing spot. The evidence dispels alternatives, especially improbable locations like a massive volcano.

Goddess Tracing: A Link to Ancient Wisdom

Deal’s findings intertwine with ancient art, revealing Naamah, the post-Flood woman, as a common thread in goddess depictions. The Sumerian Nammu, akin to Naamah, connects various goddesses. This connection, post-Babel, led to diverse titles such as Astarte, Ishtar, and Athena.


In challenging the conventional belief of Mount Ararat as Noah’s ark’s landing spot, David Deal’s research opens avenues to reconsider the narrative. The evidence at Mashur Dag paints a vivid picture of a logical, accessible landing site, reshaping our understanding of this ancient tale.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *